Helene Toner, a noted authority on technology policy, has vocalized serious concerns about the U.S. Congress’s lack of a strong, unified policy on artificial intelligence as the 2024 elections approach. Toner is worried about the possible negative implications of insufficient AI regulation and oversight, especially given its potential to influence various facets of American life.
Having an extensive background in legislative affairs, Toner pointed out the fragmented attempts by Congress to craft AI policies. She highlights that the measures taken so far do not consider the holistic impact of AI technology on society. “While there are individual bills, we lack a comprehensive strategy that encompasses the varied dimensions and effects AI could have across our society,” she stated.
Toner emphasized the criticality of adopting a careful approach to AI regulation due to its capability to revolutionize sectors like healthcare, transportation, and education, coupled with its associated risks concerning privacy, security, and embedded biases.
A vocal advocate for inclusivity in AI policy frameworks, Toner argues that ensuring diverse participation in AI development is crucial to counter potential biases and disparities. “It’s essential that AI development includes diverse perspectives to avoid perpetuating existing inequalities and cater to the needs of all community sectors,” she remarked.
Despite these hurdles, Toner is hopeful about Congress’s ability to formulate a detailed, effective AI policy. She praised the dedication of certain congress members towards addressing pertinent technological challenges and urged for a more unified and strategic collaboration to match the pace of AI advancements.
As AI becomes a pivotal issue in the impending elections, with various candidates acknowledging its significance, Toner stresses the need for a clear and comprehensive AI policy framework. She suggests the establishment of a bipartisan congressional task force that includes experts from multiple disciplines to create an inclusive AI policy.
Additionally, Toner calls for an active public participation in the AI policy-making process, to ensure community insights and impacts are considered. “It’s crucial that we engage the public in this debate to fully understand AI’s implications and develop a policy that reflects the interests and protects the rights of all individuals,” she explained.
Conclusively, Toner’s message emphasizes urgency in addressing AI policy: “We must act without delay to tackle these pressing issues. To genuinely benefit from AI’s potential, concerted efforts to devise a comprehensive and inclusive policy are imperative right now.”